The long-running rivalry between Ja Rule and 50 Cent flared up again after Fif made controversial remarks about the late Irv Gotti.
Rule expressed his anger over the comments during an appearance on the Breakfast Club.
“I was hot, I was ready to go nuclear and sh*t. […] I don’t want to start trouble, make trouble with people. But if we gotta get into it, make it, I’ll f*****g end it,” he said.
Fif, almost instinctively, issued a response to the Murder Inc. rapper’s comments on social media.
“The Breakfast Club should be ashamed of themselves asking questions that perpetuate violence,” he wrote in the caption. “This fool has been ready to go what he calls nuclear for 22 years. LOL. Ya man in my Runtz right now!”
50’s scathing post caused Rule to go ballistic in a social media rant where, to challenge his credibility, Rule posted paperwork claiming the G-Unit mogul had cooperated with authorities to place an order of protection on Murder Inc.
Legal expert and lawyer Bradford Cohen quickly stepped in to debunk Ja Rule’s claims. On Instagram, Cohen analyzed the documents and pointed out inconsistencies.
“The gun came from a stop and search of his vehicle. There was no ‘snitch’ involved in his case,” Cohen clarified, addressing Ja Rule’s claims that 50 Cent was a federal informant during the Murder Inc. investigation over 20 years ago.
Cohen also pointed out flaws in the documents Ja Rule presented, explaining that police reports don’t name informants. “This document lists an informant. 1. Police reports don’t name informants by name 2. We know it’s not Curtis because they are listing people hurt, including a. Informant b. Curtis c. Marvin (whoever that is),” Cohen said. He concluded, “His theory is debunked by the very paperwork. Dumb people would ignore the commas between the names. Don’t be a dummy.”
